>>>I tried this but it shows entries in these fields for all records in the table. And I want to have the combo show only entries in ONE (currently selected) record.
>>
>>

* combo.init
>>this.addproperty("aFld[1]")
>>this.requery()
>>
>>* combo.requery
>>n=afield(a,"yourtablealias")
>>dimension this.afld[n]
>>for i=1 to n
>>  this.aFld[i]=eval(forceext("yourtablealias", a[i])
>>endfor
>>

>>
>>However, if you have such a table where the entities of the same type are spread across the fields, I'd rather recommend you have a good look at your database design and think it over. There's a good reason why it's so easy to fill a combo with columns from a table, and why you have to do the above kludge to fill it with fields.
>>
>>If these data are coming from an outside source, my sympathies for your trouble.
>
>Thank you very much for the suggestion and sample code. What I decided to do (have not tested yet) is to set the combo RowSourceType to 1 - Value and then set the RowSource to the values in the table fields. And I will do it in the GotFocus method of the combo, since I need to dynamically change the combo RowSource based on the currently selected record.
>
>I know what you are saying about "wrong" database design. It is true, you are right, but for the reasons that are too long to go into right now, I am sticking with the "wrong" design because it is the "right" approach from the business stand point. I know it is confusing though <g>.
>
>Again, thank you for your help.

Um, now I see I forgot that I didn't put the code to set rowsourcetype property to array, and rowsource to "this.aFld", but I figure you saw that.