Simply put it doesn't show anything and doesn't serve anything. See Dorin already did.
To say it from another edge I could write a whole application with VFP over a night and lend to .Net coders saying create the same and benchmark.
Possibilities are they wouldn't understand how to do that in .Net in a few days, they would understand and create over a night or between. Same with .Net. All actually point to one question, is it the tool or the one using the tool.

"just look at the number of posts and time spent for some people on here."
How do you know it. A magic calculation time spent here? Or are you simply checking logintime. Well with that calculation I'm working over 24hrs a day/7days a week.
Anyway I don't like to see language/tool camps.
Cetin


>I'm sure others have; just look at the number of posts and time spent for some people on here.
>
>All I said was that I would like to see the comparison written. Why so worked up about that?
>
>>You don't have time but others have? Well I don't have time too. As I replied to Einar about it, corresponding VFP code could be done in an hour or so.
>>I work with VFP, C# and of course SQL server as a companion and if you ask me, if mass data is a concern VFP is the king, except that .Net.
>>Cetin
>>
>>>After all the openly negative noise for the past year from the "Fox'ers," I'm glad Rod has finally done something to quiet it all down. What I would like to see is for someone to take the cheesy RIO app and rewrite it in Foxpro to challenge what Rod has done. I can't, I don't have the time nor the chops for it, but I would like to see if it can be done.
>>>
>>>>Either way, it has been done and that's it. There is no need to appear so openly smug because Fox'ers have or have not responded in a way that you deem appropriate given Rod's success with Rio.Net.