>
>Of course evolution has not yet quite dotted all it's i's nor crossed all it's t's, but it does have scientific data and arguments, tests etc. Intelligent design has one argument. Once you say "this could not have evolved by accident. There must have been a designer", you're done. There is nothing more to say. There is nothing to test, nothing to predict, nothing to prove. How can anyone argue that a single statement of debatable fact is 'science'. Where is the scientific method?

I guess you could say that there is only one pool of evidence. You choose to look at it from an evolution point of view, I choose to look at it from a creation point of view. We both have the same evidence - just different beliefs.

This sums it up very well: http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/creation.asp