>LMAO.. Rod was right, then. You didn't even bother to run the thing. You are a piece of work.
The result's are not the same from the reviews I read. Aside from the list below, I have not heart if "shift" mouse - down slides an element into a different "cluster" (country) node.

I am not interested in how close Rod came to mimicing RIO. I am only interested in making an evaluation if they match feature for feature - nothing more - nothing - less.

John - if you stipulate they are exactly the same - I will down load - and test. But if I download and evaluate and find some features are not working or extra objects have been added, then:
1) You make amends to me for my troubles by admitting you don't have the skills to compare one application to another.
2) You post a new thread making the above admissions. You admit to being a "size queen". And and promise never to raise the NET / VFP issue again.

Agreed?

PS - Besides - with the meta-data issue (is it a performance or security issue?)- I may be risking my desktop to some kind of "almost intelligent design" intrusion.

>
>
>
>>>How about answering the question!
>>
>>I read the reviews - when I read one that says it matches 100% in service (not neccessarily speed) and appearance - then I will.
>>100% Service means:
>>1) Hot Navigator
>>2) One form
>>3) Reverse select on Treeview (enter an existing id and highlight the tree node)
>>
>>It means every behavior of RIO must be precisely immitated.
>>
>>We are not playing horse shoes here - I'll set aside the "large" net footprint once someone posts a follow up that says the applications look and respond exactly the same. That means no extra forms - and all features correspond 100%.
>>
>>I am not interested in how close - I am interested in a precise mimic - down to the fox in the title bar.
>>
>>Then we can talk about performance and foorprint.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>How about answering the question?
>>>>They're not the same - if you cannot see the difference - get some new glasses!:-)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well I knew, and predicted, that you would not be able to resist slamming the rio.net conversion. How does it not deliver the same features? From what I saw, it looked to me to be the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then I have a VW Bug on a chopped frame with a fiberglass "Ferrari shell" that I would like to sell you - not at the price one would sell an old Dune Buggy - but at the price one would sell a Ferrari.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Lets put em both on a monitor (side by side) at a DEVCON - maybe then you will "see" the difference.