>Hi everybody,
>
>It looks like there is no way to derive a visual class from prg based class? E.g. I have BusinessProcess class, which is based on aCustom. aCustom is based on custom. I put aCustom and BusinessProcess classes definitions into separate prgs. And I want to be able to have my child classes NameSearch and QueueProcess in the vcx libraries. Am I out of luck and I still have to convert my visual libraries in prg every time I need to release them?
>
>Thanks in advance.


Yes
Except that for the XXXXXXClasses (deClass,memberClass... )
the VFPT has not implemented the support of the prgs as source for the VCXs/SCXs
in Class Designer/Form Designer.
The change to be done to VFP is least, but by now the VFP run is finished

Hacking VCX/SCX I have succeeded in making to work the all, but not in a way usable from the IDE.

It moves within the aCustom and BusinessProcess to a VCX, if you are able.