>>>Hi everybody,
>>>
>>>It looks like there is no way to derive a visual class from prg based class? E.g. I have BusinessProcess class, which is based on aCustom. aCustom is based on custom. I put aCustom and BusinessProcess classes definitions into separate prgs. And I want to be able to have my child classes NameSearch and QueueProcess in the vcx libraries. Am I out of luck and I still have to convert my visual libraries in prg every time I need to release them?
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>Yes
>>Except that for the XXXXXXClasses (deClass,memberClass... )
>>the VFPT has not implemented the support of the prgs as source for the VCXs/SCXs
>> in Class Designer/Form Designer.
>>The change to be done to VFP is least, but by now the VFP run is finished
>>
>>Hacking VCX/SCX I have succeeded in making to work the all, but not in a way usable from the IDE.
>>
>>It moves within the aCustom and BusinessProcess to a VCX, if you are able.
>
>I tried to hack vcx, but then I got an error saying that .prg must be a table. So, I guess I would have to convert every time. E.g. for my own simplicity of development I will use vcx form, but in our project we would have prg based classes.

Naomi,
Does a motive exist for doing this?
This is a beautiful way to make themselves some evil.