>I suppose you are putting yourself in that category? .Net is a huge topic with many areas of specialisation, massively bigger than VFP - define a "qualified .Net developer" and who on this board is, in your opinion "qualified"."
>
>Yes.

The "Yes" bit would have done. But at least with your list below, you have got some more to add to your already impressive sig block. You are an impressive guy ;)

>
>1) MSFT has recognized me as a .NET MVP two years in a row
>
>2) .NET forum of the UT has other MVPs who are more than qualified. .NET forum has hundreds of solutions to .NET questions.
>
>3) Four articles in CoDe magazine in 2005, avg rating of 4.49 out of 5 (72 online reviews).
>
> Articles covered ADO.NET, remoting, web services, inheritance, interfaces, data access, new stuff in VS2005, T-SQL
>
> Received hundreds of positive emails. MS and SQL Server Worldwide User's Group have featured the articles.
>
>4) Received requests to speak at .NET User groups and MSDN CodeCamps - also approached for contract work.
>
>5) Book deal to write a VS2005 book
>
>
>Kevin