>>>And I agree about your initial remark to Nadya, there is a potential danger that the object passed may be re-referenced if passed by reference. Though, I've done pretty much the same thing as she did in my recurse class and never had a problem, probably because I didn't need to reuse the object passed after the recursion routine exits.
>>
>>I understand the point you were making and agree with your analysis. Also, I still think that you mixed us up. The discussion was about changing a parameter and its effect in the calling program.
>
>So I misread your intention :). Not the first time - thanks for having the patience to clear this up.
>
>>BTW, who is Nadya? <g>
>
>Nadya is to Naomi what Renoir is to Jay.
Isn't it the other way around: Nadya is to Naomi what Jay is to Renoir <g>
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
