Hi Terry/Dorin,

Sorry if I confused you, all I wanted was to hear some speed measures from someone who uses higher version of VFP, since xml2cursor does not exist in VFP6, and I cannot do it myself.

So for as long as xml2cursor/cursor2xml is happening in the memory - speed is ok.

I know, I know - It is long due time to upgrade to VFP9 :)

Thks Guys :)


>>Hi Dorin,
>>
>>Thks for your code. This results still sound much better then
>>those that Terry reported in his message.
>>
>That was some pretty clean code Dorin posted! I somethimes think that a more "literal" approach, as opposed to the SCATTER macro might save a tid bit.
>
>But no one told me an object could be used:-(.
>
>I thought the data had to go through some sort ISAPI process. I don't think an HTTP SEND or REQUEST can pass a "classed" object as a parameter (yet). But if you're not going through an ISP with or using something newer than VFP 6, the the "Container" solution is the one - and XML2Cursor will probably do the trick.