That is not what I meant :)
Money is not an object here, it is just that web is simply not under my responsability.

>West Wind Internet & Client Tools if free/shareware, so your financials should not be hurt.
>
>>Hi Tore,
>>
>>Not yet, I read some stuff here and there but never realy
>>got opportunity to do any web development :(
>>Anyway you turn it, I always end up with damn financials ...
>>
>>In this case I wanted to know how efficeint is xmltocursor/cursortoxml for passing cursors arround within VFP app .
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi Srdjan,
>>>
>>>have you tried Rick Strahl's West Wind Internet & Client Tools which have some free XML functions similar to Cursortoxml and Xmltocursor? Read more at http://www.west-wind.com/wwClientTools.asp
>>>
>>>>Hi Terry/Dorin,
>>>>
>>>>Sorry if I confused you, all I wanted was to hear some speed measures from someone who uses higher version of VFP, since xml2cursor does not exist in VFP6, and I cannot do it myself.
>>>>
>>>>So for as long as xml2cursor/cursor2xml is happening in the memory - speed is ok.
>>>>
>>>>I know, I know - It is long due time to upgrade to VFP9 :)
>>>>
>>>>Thks Guys :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Dorin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thks for your code. This results still sound much better then
>>>>>>those that Terry reported in his message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>That was some pretty clean code Dorin posted! I somethimes think that a more "literal" approach, as opposed to the SCATTER macro might save a tid bit.
>>>>>
>>>>>But no one told me an object could be used:-(.
>>>>>
>>>>>I thought the data had to go through some sort ISAPI process. I don't think an HTTP SEND or REQUEST can pass a "classed" object as a parameter (yet). But if you're not going through an ISP with or using something newer than VFP 6, the the "Container" solution is the one - and XML2Cursor will probably do the trick.