>But Bush said he has only been eaves dropping on those known to be in communication with Al-Q.
>
>So we apparently have the intelligence we need to determine they are a terrorist or working with them.
>
>Unless Bush has backed away from that position? Is that the case?
Assuming you are paraphrasing, then persons known to be in communication with members of AQ may or may not be terrorists. It is still a fairly broad net, and I would hardly say that is enough intelligence to determine if they are a threat or not without monitoring the communications themselves.
Dan LeClair
www.cyberwombat.comSET RANT ON - The Wombat BlogLife isn’t a morality contest and purity makes a poor shield. - J. Peter MulhernDisclaimer: The comments made here are only my OPINIONS on various aspects of VFP, SQL Server, VS.NET, systems development, or life in general, and my OPINIONS should not be construed to be the authoritative word on any subject. No warranties or degrees of veracity are expressed or implied. Void where prohibited. Side effects may included dizziness, spontaneous combustion, or unexplainable cravings for dark beer. Wash with like colors only, serve immediately for best flavor.