Hi Dragan,

> Is this because the RadiansPerPixel is constant?

>> Or maybe the lens is not linear? Try moving one of your poles in an arc around the
>> lens, keeping the distance constant, and check how wide in pixels does it get. If
>> the lens is linear, the pixelwidth should stay the same.

Yes. Hopefully I will be able to try this over the weekend!

>>The rest of your ideas (saturation etc) sound quite right - whatever helps, why not.

Yeah - I think I'm on the right track. I definitely understand the issues, so I
suppose I am half way there!

>P.S. You will need to installation version 2.0 of the Microsoft.NET Framework to run
>the test harness application. The installation wizard should pick this up :)

>>Um... my machine is already unstable as is (read as "five BSODs a week ever since I
>>moved from W2KSP2 to SP4), so I'm a little worried about dot net making it worse. But
>>then, who knows, it may even help.

I can understand your reservations, especially if you are already having issues. My only advice is that if you do decide to take the plunge, you should backup your entire
system first! But I'm guessing you know that already :)

I can say that I have personally installed the .NET 2 framework on both my home and work computer - including my test harness - without experiencing any problems, however both computers are running on Windows XP (SP2). I guess I'm just a big fat Microsoft guinea pig :)

Kind Regards
Simon