>You, of course, can create the content yourself (including all of the above) by talking to the DOM exposed in the control.

I have been learning bits about the document DOM. The more I get into it the more it seems to make sense(?:-). There does not seem to be a heirachy either. I was surprized that tag nested "id's" were at the document level and did not require a "family" tree to reference.

The 'html' tags are to be stored in a memo/notes field as an xml string. Another pleasant surprize was that script and controls imported as "innerHTML" do not affect the document "state". Any stores and existing js and css references will dance at first ask!

I was worried about that for a while(?). It may have been a CGI issue (html on the fly). CGI html, if i reckon rightly, ignored embedded js or css include files. But innerHTML treats it as though loaded through url.