Walter Meester
HoogkarspelNetherlands
Hi Dan,
>Did you ever find a resolution to this? Did upgrading to VFP 9 get rid of it?
In the end, yes we got rid of it. It had to do with a bug in VFP8SP1 and VFP9 (without SP), where internal buffers got corrupted in transactions.
The solution Microsoft gave us, was to put SYS(1104) at least before the transaction starts.
So we put a few sys(1104) in our framework and the system is behaving quit nicely. I have not seen a lot of C5 since then.
Walter,
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only