>>You clearly have a lot of knowledge about that war.
>
>While I never even visited Kosovo, I was in the country during the war, and haven't forgotten the whole media campaign that led to it.
>
>>And I am not in the position to argue the facts you mention. The only thing I can point to is what I already pointed to: When talking about clean hands and clean conscience, we're talking about perception, rather than about actual reality. Your info makes clear that the real numbers were known early by some. And yes, they could've been known too by Clinton, early. But do you have PROOF of that? Rumors is not enough in this case.
>
>For a while I was one of the translators for the freeserbia.org (an Anti-NATO, Anti-Miloseivic website), at least while it lasted, and it had an extensive archive of lots of things. Part of the archive may still be present somewhere at xs4all.nl, though I think it must have been deactivated by now.

I've sent an e-mail to xs4all, who happens to be my provider also, and asked them to investigate the matter. Let's wait for their answer.

>Nobody at home is really interested into digging into all that - and anyone who approaches the matter is a suspect for a domestic political agenda: do we have a Milosevic defender here, or is it something else one's trying to push. It's been a number of years that I've even thought about that whole dirty little war. So, even though I have seen some things on the Web and elsewhere that I think I could trust (maybe even UN files, don't really remember), I haven't systemmatically collected them. If I was a "zlopamtilo" (one who keeps remembering evil), I wouldn't be where I am.
>
>> If Clinton was really thinking in large numbers of deaths, than his hands were clean, but his mind was not. Agree?
>
>Yes. And I'dd add that as much as media forced him into this sort of action (but then who forced the media?), he also used the same media to wash his hands. It's up to his conscience to believe or not that he has heard all sides first.