When, in history, did the Palestinians disarm?
>Maybe because history does not support it?
>
>
>>>>Belligerent
>>>>. Inclined or eager to fight; hostile or aggressive.
>>>>. Of, pertaining to, or engaged in warfare.
>>>>. One that is hostile or aggressive, especially one that is engaged in war.
>>>>
>>>>Are you refering to Israel here???? You must be out of your mind!
>>>>
>>>>If the Palestinians would unarm, there would be peace.
>>>>If the Israelis would unarm, they would be driven in the sea.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, I was referring to Israel. As to whether I am out of my mind, well, I would be the last to know, right?
>>>
>>>If the Palestinians disarmed, there would be peace -- for Israel. The Palestinians would still be stateless and would still be subject to Israel putting up walls, invading settlements with tanks, etc. (Which are certainly taken as belligerent acts by the Palestinians).
>>
>>Sorry I missed this reply yesterday, Mike.
>>I tell you, if the Palestinians disarmed, there would be peace, for BOTH sides!!! YES, the Israelis would take down the walls. YES, they would no longer 'invade' settlements with tanks. YES, they would help the Palestinians build up their own state and economy. Etcetera. How come you don't believe that???? This is the big mystery to me!
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
