i don't think that russia will want to commit forces and neither would china, and the us and uk are too over stretched with iraq to invade so it would have to be a bombing run by someone, possibly israel again. only problem is if you don't get them all and they do have nukes... as tom says large hole where israel is but then israel would counter with the nukes that they (don't) have and so the entire region is gone. now i don't know if that is THE solution to the problems there but it is A solution. i think that the only thing that will work is UN monitors and lots of them and also sanctions for looking in the wrong direction.

>In view of the current controversy over Iran's insistance on pursuing a nuclear goal, the rare, unanimous agreement of the UN founder states, even Russia and China, that it's BAD, given Iran's pariah state status of the last few decades, seeing what the Coalition did about a similar perceived case in Iraq, what do you think of the chances that there will be a few precision, surgical strikes of such facilities in the not-too-distant future?