>>>>>>>lo=eval("m.toThis." + m.lcObjName)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's I believe what I tried. But may be I did put mismatched quotes... I'll re-try.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>UPDATE. Yes, it worked. I had a very bad headache the whole day yesterday at work, may be I just could not concentrate... My colleague told me he also had it and my son did, so I think it's weather related...
>>>>>
>>>>>use
>>>>>

>>>>>lo=GETPEM(m.toThis,m.lcObjName)
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>>I thought about it too. But anyway, evaluate works and it seems good enough for me.
>>>
>>>It work ( slower ),
>>>but it is formally wrong when the object reference is static
>>>as in :
>>>"m.toThis."
>>
>>Could you please elaborate more? Also GetPem doesn't have object reference as a return type, that's why I thought it would not work.
>
>??? why ???
>If GETPEM didn't return an object reference, what it could return?
>
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>I mean you this
>

>* this it is VFP static code and then it is faster
>r1=GETPEM(m.toThis,m.lcObjName)
>* this return the same value,
>* but when someone uses unnecessary dynamic code, it do a mistake
>r2=eval("m.toThis." + m.lcObjName)
>? "this print true",r1=r2
>

So everything done before VFP 6 was a mistake? GETPEM was added in VFP6.