Not after the blowup about Iraq. No.
>Tom
>
>>If the UN gets involved there is a good chance that nothing will be resolved. A few “sanctions”, and the Iranian nuclear program will continue as if it was business as usual.
>
>You don't think that Uncle Sam might act unilaterally of bilaterally with Nephew Tony?
>
>> Some day this area is going to POP!
>
>Tell me about it!
>
>Terry
>
>>
>>>In view of the current controversy over Iran's insistance on pursuing a nuclear goal, the rare, unanimous agreement of the UN founder states, even Russia and China, that it's BAD, given Iran's pariah state status of the last few decades, seeing what the Coalition did about a similar perceived case in Iraq, what do you think of the chances that there will be a few precision, surgical strikes of such facilities in the not-too-distant future?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"