>This is a standard local view definition (actually, I've got it from View Designer window)
>
>

>SELECT Accesslog.id, Accesslog.userid, Accesslog.computerid,;
>  Accesslog.logindatetime, Accesslog.logoutdatetime;
> FROM appdata!AccessLog;
> WHERE  Accesslog.userid = ?vpUserId
>

>
>So it definately supports ? in Selects.
>
>My guess would be VFPT has added ? to SELECTS because they need them in views. Given the fact View Designer cannot be used to construct an INSERT or an UPDATE view, they didn't need ? for those, hence ? is not supported anywere beside SELECTss. However, I think ? should be supported.

Which is exactly what I wrote i message#1095839. To me this makes perfectly sense, but I also agree that the VFPT should add the same syntax option to Insert and Update, to be consistent. Which reminds me of one of my other long time wishes, namely that they make Where and For interchangable in scopes. I don't know how many times I have written Browse where something in stead of Browse for something. The VFPT's answer to my request? "Will this sell more copies of VFP?"....

>Maybe a new entry in WishList for Sedna? :)