No, I don't think that was why it was rejected. The key thing was not accepting software contributions where there is an "existing 3rd party product". Then they seemed to backtrack and say it was because ActiveVFP would damage some existing companies if it were to become part of SednaX. Are you confused yet?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only