>> I think the only mistake for the new SednaX community project was in doing an open call for projects to work on.

Sounds logical and reasonable to me.

>> As a close knit 'SednaX' follow-on project it has it's purpose (and a significant one). Just not the one that apparently numerous people thought it was, including me.

I agree, and your points are all valid and understandable. Hopefully people view this thread as constuctive and useful.