Hi Steve.

>Obviously, we have a terminology clash here. And the current misunderstandings boil down to just that. I have no doubt that the project as you have clarified it will succeed so long as clear 'rules of engagement' are defined and every 'participant' understands those rules up front. These discussions have helped in that regard.

Yes, these discussions have helped a lot. Craig is putting together a mission statement and will post it once it's ready. Hopefully it will define for everyone what the rules are.

Some people in this discussion have raised the fact that early on, we invited third-party vendors to submit their products to SednaX. After thinking about this a bit, we realized that didn't really fit the vision of SednaX, so we clarified that in a later post. I hope everyone realizes that SednaX is an envolving thing and that its administrators are both humans and volunteers, meaning we may make mistakes or sometimes jump the gun.

Doug