>Hi Cindy.
>
>>I think much of the discussion here is because the admins weren't sure whether the proposed software was freeware or shareware, and also that the issue of source code not being provided was not in keeping with traditional open-source projects. I notice that Craig did not specifically say that the provision of source code was a requirement with freeware submissions.
>>
>>Things evolve and change over time.
>
>Well-stated! Thank you.
>
>>Perhaps the best end to this whole discussion would be for the SednaX admins to come out with a statement to the effect that since SednaX has grown so much that they find it necessary to more specifically define appropriate SednaX projects, and make suggestions on where/how to share projects they feel are not appropriate for SednaX.
>
>Craig is working on a mission statement right now and will post it once it's ready.
>

Hi Doug,

MissionStatementX? ;-)