Right! The funny thing my code was already beautiful and I still insisted to 'beautify' again:)
Cetin

>Cetin,
>
>You should just type beautiful code to begin with. *bg*
>
>On a more serious side beautify should keep its grubby paws off all string constants.
>
>>As Fred and Sergey pointed out there is a directive to protect from the bug - the only problem left is I should remember it everytime I attempt to beautify and check places that beautify breakes:)
>>Cetin