>>First, Ken was never in the same postion as Milind. Milind is the Program Manager (Randy Brown's old job). Ken was Product Manager. They are easy to confuse, but totally different things.
>>
>>Second, Ken did not make the decision to not port VFP to the CLR. Spamming Milind with such request will not change the decision.
>
>
>Entirely correct. On top of that there is this statement from Hank:
>
>>>So if you want VFP to have the best of both worlds, now would be a good time to let Milind know. It's no longer technologically infeasible: it's only a matter of resources.
>
>It was never a question of technology. It was always feasible. It is a matter of resources and a matter of making sense, business or otherwise. Situation has not changed. It does not make sense to have the XBASE engine in the CLR. It won't happen.

Geez, way more people thought getting to the moon was IMPOSSIBLE. And more still that it didn't make sense.
Where have all the dreamers gone? What is the value of yours and Craig's comments here?