Metin,

>>Because they are affraid. Affraid because it is a fundamentalistic country with anti-western feelings, which is quickly gaining the technology to create an atomic bomb. With one fundamentalistic leader who can decide all, you have a very dangerous situation, as history shows us. It only takes one madman to create a horrendous disaster.
>
>Maybe Iran will made a nuclear bomb in next years, but USA has a lot of nuclear bomd today (Enough for demolish world).

>Maybe Bush is a fundamentalistic leader. Don't forget he talk about crusade. Maybe it scared all of us.

I think there are a lot of people including some americans up here that don't like the actions of its government and the way it has taken, but the united states in general is far from a fundamentalistic nation. It won't come that far. To be honest, though the president of iran was chosen democratically, I don't see iran as a democratic nation: It talks hate about isreal and jews and deny the holocaust. It is muslim fundamentalistic and it is developing an automic program. Sorry, but this not something that makes me very comfortable.

>>... Nowerdays we are forming a european union out of many countries with different cultures and languages. I don't see what the arab world could not start doing this.

>I uncertain will be occur about Union Europa, however you right I can't understand why Arabs cannot do that too.

That is because the arabs have internal problems to solve first. Problems that are becoming appearant now in iraq between the two major islamic flavors. Their leaders have been ignoring the problems by always pointing to the enemy (US, isreal, whole western world) as source of their problems. This is a common and often very succesfull tactic to divert the attention of internal problems (same has and is happening between pakistan and india).

Walter,