>>>>Ehh, can you back this up?
>>
>>>http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1510
>>>http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/7049.htm
>>>http://iran-press-service.com/articles_2001/sep_2001/us_terrorism_13901.htm
>>>http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060122-111620-8570r.htm
>>
>>It seems vague and too insignificant to me. I don't see evidence for terrorist trainingcamps. Other than afghanistan and syria, I don't see iran as a terroristic state.


>Terrorist training camps? Is that your only criteria? How about money, supplies, intelligence? As always, you're discounting whatever proof I can supply.

In short I don't see iran structually supporting terrorists in the way that other some muslim countries do (Afghanistan, Syria, libanon). They might support actions of terroristic groups on a smaller scale, but this is a vague criteria as many countries do on some form. The US also has a history of doing that in afghanistan, latin america and other places. If you want to use this as an argument, you have to mention that iran certainly not the only country in the region doing this.

>Why don't you just come out and say you choose not to believe anything I say?

Ehhhm because that is not true. In this thread I totally agreed upon your statement iran does not need nuclear power.

In this same thread you implied isreal as a neighbour of iran, which simply is not true, so I corrected.

>Why do I even bother arguing with you?

You're free to respond or not. It is a free world (site anyways :))

Walter,