>>>Yup it's only hypothetical, but the fact that that's your solution is what puzzles me.
>
>>Well what other "solution" would there be when we invited them?
>We would surely know their special needs before we did invite them...
>
>For the most part we accept them with open arms, but we don't necessarily invite them, do we?
>If they choose to live amoung us, shouldn't they be expected to live under the same laws and be expected to be treated like anyone else? I think this would be more efficient and fair solution.

The hypothesis was that we agreed to accept them, meaning that we 'invited' them, as I see it.
Now it's true that in the U.S. yours is a melting pot style of assimilation.
Here we do things a little differently, trying to accommodate cultural variations to the extent we can. It may be more expensive, but it does seem to be more interesting too.