Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
>Yet another lecture. You seem tend to go in the past. What was at the beginning of this thread is gone, can't change it. However, we can still change present and the future. Let's focus on this moment - after you won the victory. Congratulations by the way.
I don't want to win any battle.
I use VFP for job, not to play!
> I am under impression that, I was supposed to do something, change in some way. However, it looks like I failed to do so. I got this impression from this phrase "I succeed in making to understand him that what has done creates notable problems and despite this wants to be right the same". And this fact seems disappointed you a lot.
Of course.
>So, what is it exactly was I supposed to do not at the beginning of the thread, but after you won the victory? We still got time.
Here I don't follow you anymore. What interests me that you do I have already written it: to improve VFP in the VFP9SP2;
you will clearly respond me that the roadmap it is different
( my opinion on SEDNA is that it is only a loss of time ).
I can accept it only.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement