There is no argument- every banning has involved the PA crew. Period.

Ah, I see you're changing your words. First you said 'contributed'. Now you say 'involved'. A few months ago my wife was "involved" in a car accident - but didn't contribute in any meaningful way. Big difference.

Yes, people "from PA" have been "involved" in exchanges that led to bannings. News flash: bannings don't happen in a total vacuum. But that doesn't mean they contributed to them. Claude Fox and William Sanders were banned because of their behavior.

Once again, these poorly-framed arguments are not at all interesting.

As for "cowardly"- that's your word, not mine, though I have no doubt that in a day or two you'll insist I called you a coward while your own behavior is as pure as the driven snow.

What would you call a vague criticism that avoids direct identification? It's a convenient way to toss something out there without being held to account for specifics.

Do me a favor - point me to explicit statements I've made, where I bullied or goaded people into behavior that got them banned. And if you can't - then refer to people by specific names, and "keep my name outcha mouth" where this topic is concerned.

And by the way, explain to me why you jump on John Baird anytime he turns up the volume, but you never said a word when Bill Sanders went totally ballistic on me.

I never said I was as pure as the driven snow. But I've contributed a fair amount to the community. Can you say the same???

Kevin