>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Aw, Barbara, did you really think that I'd pass this up? Oh well...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes, it looks like they're on the *horns* of a dilemma. But after all, there's a lot at *stake* here. And they do have *grounds* for they're *beef*. And this is another *prime* example of how easy it is to get me started. But it was your *choice*. 'Scuse me, I've gotta *hoof* it on outta here.:-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We were just wondering how long it would take you to stake your claim on this thread. Looks like others have a tendency to *eat their young* as well. Personally, I do not look a gift horse in the mouth, nor do I beat a dead one. Long live VFP!
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for the response, Mark. I was beginning to think I'd lost my touch. You know how much I like to *horse* around with kind of stuff. It looks like some folks have a few *burrs under their saddles*. I'll bet this *gallops* on for awhile. As for "Long live VFP!", it's a *cinch*.
>>>>
>>>>Sounds like a lot of bull to me...
>>>
>>>I need my boots now! It's really gettin thick.
>>
>>Donald,
>>
>>Having nothing to do with the thread (yeah, I know it's against the rules), but for some reason, I can't read your posts from Netscape 3.0. IE 3.0 is fine, but with Netscape all I get is a blank screen where the message should be. The only thing I can think of is that there's something in your signature that the browser can't handle. Any clues, anyone?
>
>Another MS Undocumented Feature???{bg}

Nope, an undocumented Netscape 3.0 feature.:-)