>But this is what I was referring to ... avoiding the use of App_Code.dll ... these tools supposedly give you a way to name your .DLLs back to whatever you want (that way, basically, you can continue to do things the way you did in 1.1).
>
>But, anyway, if what you're doing works for you, then that's ok too. =)

Interesting, but I guess I would probably wait for enhancements in the VS 2005 interface for such needs. Presently, I have an approach that does the job well so I will keep that as is unless it is part of the interface. I have a lot of documentation to do in regards to that so we try to keep as within MS tools as possible so it would be easier for someone else to take over.