I agree, but others may read 'em. I like this Waas article because of the breadth of coverage. Puts it all in context.

>Why even bother. You've posted some of the best links I've seen and all you get is comments like Dan's about "oh here you go beating a dead horse to death again".
>
>To me, starting a war on false pretenses is pretty dam*ing evidence. But who am I to speak up.
>
>And it seems to me that having a lawyer for the oil industry editing scientific documents on global warming is slightly out there. That's on top of the political appointee to Nasa who told the scientists they should lessen the amount of times they discuss the big bank theory since it cuts down on the time available to discuss "intelligent design". But it's only the environment.
>
>And we have this piece of paper called the constitution that discusses something called "separation of church and state". And we now have some religious groups sharing in govt money. All of whom seem to be part of the christian right.
>
>>http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330nj1.htm
>>
>>>>We have a president who brought us to war on false pretenses. Costing thousands of lives. Did you hear the Delta guy mention WWIII the other day?
>>>
>>>No. How about a link?
>>>