This video is from september 2005 and it may have been mentioned and discussed here already. But it is remarkable enough to mention it again:
http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=114680As was also the case with Ken's channel9 video, its quality is terrible when it focuses on the screen. Nevertheless, it is informative and makes clear in what way the sql language is implemented in C#3. Its resemblance with the implementation in vfp is striking indeed. And did I understand Anders Heljsberg right? Did they introduce soft datatyping (although they call it an anonymous datatype)?
>Hi.
>I've been reading a bit about the next version of C# (3.0) which will incorporate LINQ (Langauge Integrated Query) features.
>It would appear to me that a lot of the stuff they are goin to be putting into C# 3.0 is nearly directly taken from functionality that is alredy in VFP, and after this version, in fact Dot net will have almost everthing that VFP has.
>
>So I am just psing the question if :
>C# 3.0 = VFP 10 or indeed if VFP 10 = C# 3.0
>
>Any comments ?
>
>regards,
>Gerard
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
