Hola, Enmanuel.

I'll follow in English because it is the official language for that forum.

Yes, SharpDevelop supports BOO, and it is a very interesting language indeed, has some features that appeared later in the C# 2 and 3 specs, like duck typing (anonymous types in C#), lambda expressions and so forth. It is worth taking a look to get at least some interesting design ideas that yo can apply to other languages.

As for Resharper, it is quite unique. It is a lot more than a refactoring tool, really. Live templates, on-the-fly static analysys and lots of different helpers make it improve Visual Studio in many ways. The only consideration you may have is that it is not a free product, but a commercial one. Anyway, the 99 USD I paid saved me so many work hours that it is better than free (disclaimer: I'm just a happy user - I don't own stock shares of JetBrains <s>).

Regards,

>Hola Martin, he ido descubriendo algunas cositas del #Develop, por ejemplo que tiene soporte para el lenguage Boo (no que me interese particularmente porque prefiero C#) y que hasta donde pude ver la version 2.0 no tiene implementado el soporte para algunos controles.
>
>A propósito, que ventajas tiene el ReSharper que lo prefieres sobre los demás?
>
>>Hi, Enmanuael.
>>
>>>I've just downloaded SharpDevelop 2.0 Beta this week and I'm wondering about the experiences of others with this free .NET IDE. So far I've found that SharpDevelop doesn't support all the project types of the full VS 2005 IDE (more specifically the lack of support for mobile projects) but I also find it better than the Express Editions (and lighter).
>>
>>Yes, it does not support everything, but it also has other things VS doesn't have like nice integration with NUnit, NAnt, and several other tools. VS is a commercial product, SharpDevelop is Open source. Each one has its strenghts and shortcomings.
>>
>>Personally I like SharpDevelop very much but I almost stopped using it once I became a ReSharper addict...
>>
>>Best luck,