>>So Bush wants to nuke Iran now huh?
>>
>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=C3HY5I431EHHRQFIQMGSFFWAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2006/04/09/wbush09.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/04/09/ixportaltop.html
>>
>>Hey if he can't get gas to $5.00 a gallon by the end of his term at least he can start World War 3.
>
>Long thread, but I'm just first glancing at it. At first glance it seems like just a pile of bull. Then I read through some of it. Yep. Bull.
>
>He didn't cause the gas prices. That's an ignorant assupmtion, devoid of any economical common sense.
>
>He can't nuke Iran, he shot his load in Iraq, and he only had one.
>
>Your thread is simply alarmist and apropos of nothing.

I was under the impression that the writer of the article was a very respectable writer. Of course what they're really saying is that the idea of using nukes is NOT off the table, doesn't necessarly mean it will happen.
As far as the gas cost goes, yes there are a lot of things to factor into that, however, if Bush was not our president, we probably wouldn't be involved in our little illeagal war over in Iraq - which I think (no proof to back it up though) is one of the main factors in the gas price hike.