>>>>Really? I know that you follow the news, Hilmar, and that you are a pacifist. Maybe one doesn't let you realize the other?
>>>
>>>U.S. has used sorry excuses to invade Iraq, and it may do the same thing again with other countries.
>>
>>I'm talking about the article you cited. It's not exactly an unbiased source.
>
>Nothing is ever an unbiased source. Generally we tend to trust sources that tell us what we want to hear. I honestly don't know of such a thing as an 'unbiased' source. For my money, perhaps, the BBC News comes closest, but that may just be my bias sticking it's nose in.
>
>Anyway, it's not much use quoting sources regardless which side of the issue one is on. The other side can always say, "It's not exactly an unbiased source."

Well, no, in your case I think I can firmly say that it is a biased source. <g> I'm with you on the BBC. It may not have alot of flash, but it seems to give the most complete view.