>Whose administration? Ours? I think it was Bush who specifically mentioned WMDs on the move to sympathetic countries as a possibility before we ever landed in Iraq. And Syria has always been an issue when it comes to terrorist states. That entire area has sponsored various forms of terrorism for decades, which -- by the way -- was *before* the current administration took office... at least until the truth ministers try to convince us otherwise (we were *always* at war with East Asia). So, again, let's stop pretending we know which person is responsible for which policy in which administration that's really to blame... let's end the political posturing... let's deal with facts and figure the mess out. Then, when the dust settles we can all sit back and gather our pointed throwing stones.
>
>>Maybe the administration knew there were no wmd's to move to Syria. So Syria is not an issue.

1. No WMD's were found before by Blix and his crew, nor after the invasion by the U.S. forces.
2. When no WMD's were found the tune changed to 'liberation'.

The rest is speculation. You choose to speculate based on what you would like to believe is going on, and I choose to speculate based on the only actual facts we have.