Except that my side of the story includes a path of corruption and misuses of power unlike anything in our history.

I still mistified how you can call yourself a deeply religious man. Yet you support a group of people who launch personal attacks against any discenting voice that include destroying someone's life.

I also don't think there's any denying they've brought politics into the scientific arena to a level never, ever seen in our history. The level of destruction they've caused in our environment might not be repairable ever.

I would think you as a police officer would be able to put 2 and 2 together when here about the history of neocons and their desire to conquor a country in the middle east. And the launch of the iraqi war, when the evidence is so questionable and has been proven to be of little quality.

>>Well, me being the great decider that I am, I have the right be the decider of what's right and wrong. The final deciding rests in my lap.
>>
>>The deciding factor is what I believe in tends to have some basis in reality. Not pipe smoke thrown out as some type of political placating.
>>
>
>True, there are three sides to every story; yours, mine and what actually happened.