As soon as he comes out and decries the issues being discussed with electronic voting and how it potentially affected the democrats in the last presidential election, or the phone jam scheme in new hamshire, I listen to what he has to say.
So far, from what I've heard from him, he's one of the biggest hypocrits I've ever heard in my life. His entire life is one big conundrum.
>>>>>>ROFLMAO
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Good work, John.
>>>>>
>>>>>Huh? Now there's an unexpected reaction.
>>>>>You think he's doing a bad thing by trying to get the incompetents out and fairness back in? Or that it's comical?
>>>>
>>>>Sure, when the fairness is only applied to one side.
>>>
>>>What John is doing is aiming at a fair and impartial system, as far as I can tell. If he can pull this off, it will be a superb thing for his area. Maybe it'll even be the start of a movement. Alice's Restaurant Massacree in Four Part Harmony. I'd love to see it sweep the entire voting system.
>>
>>Based on his posts here I might hope John would be fair but I certainly wouldn't expect him to be impartial. He clearly considers one party good guys and the other party scoundrels. That's about as fair and impartial as Fox News.
>
>Oh, no question who's side John is on, but while he can never make voters fair and impartial (not that he'd want to), if he can make the
process fair and impartial, I'm all for it (and I believe he is too). He and I are certainly flip sides of the political coin, but I do not question his honesty.
(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush