No it does not matter. But to John it does. Everything he says has to be framed in a democrat vs. republican context.

Much like prejudice, we have to get beyound that to clean up our system, which every year appears to get deeper and deeper into the slim pit.

>So corruption in one city or election doesn't exist and cannot be recognized and corrected unless you first admit to all other cases of corruption that have or possibly existed in the past? If that were true nothing would ever change. I do not understand your logic Perry. I hope I am not understanding you. I understood John to be motivated in correcting the electoral corruption in his area. Does it really matter which political party is responsible and his personal party affiliation in order for it to be corrected?
>
>
>>As soon as he comes out and decries the issues being discussed with electronic voting and how it potentially affected the democrats in the last presidential election, or the phone jam scheme in new hamshire, I listen to what he has to say.
>>
>>So far, from what I've heard from him, he's one of the biggest hypocrits I've ever heard in my life. His entire life is one big conundrum.
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>ROFLMAO
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Good work, John.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Huh? Now there's an unexpected reaction.
>>>>>>>You think he's doing a bad thing by trying to get the incompetents out and fairness back in? Or that it's comical?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sure, when the fairness is only applied to one side.
>>>>>
>>>>>What John is doing is aiming at a fair and impartial system, as far as I can tell. If he can pull this off, it will be a superb thing for his area. Maybe it'll even be the start of a movement. Alice's Restaurant Massacree in Four Part Harmony. I'd love to see it sweep the entire voting system.
>>>>
>>>>Based on his posts here I might hope John would be fair but I certainly wouldn't expect him to be impartial. He clearly considers one party good guys and the other party scoundrels. That's about as fair and impartial as Fox News.
>>>
>>>Oh, no question who's side John is on, but while he can never make voters fair and impartial (not that he'd want to), if he can make the process fair and impartial, I'm all for it (and I believe he is too). He and I are certainly flip sides of the political coin, but I do not question his honesty.