>
>>Clinton was a liar and a dog.
>
>Bush was an alcohol/drug addict, did not accomplish anything before 40, and really does not have a clue about what goes on in the real world. Bush is a puppet. At least clinton knew what he was talking about.
>

>I can understand people calling clinton a liar, but calling a dog? Why? because he was democrat? I would bet if he would have been republican and did exactly the thing he did, you would have liked him. It really is pathetic, ignorant and dumb, alowing yourself to be manipulated by the media and by the political parties. I do not have much respect or what so ever for any americans falling in this category, not having a clue of the world outside. This is exactly the critisism of other other countries in the world. I do recognize there are a lot of americans calling for change, so I have not given up hope.
>

I'm not manipulated by anyone. I looked at the facts and I must apologize, I should have said "dog in heat." Just calling him a dog is a great disservice to the many dogs that roam the earth!


>The worst thing is the missuse of religion for these purposes. This is not Gods word. Gods word is more often missused than it serves nobel goals, unfortunately. Therefore I don't believe in God. I believe in humans who apply common sense.
>
>Walter,

I've seen no misuse of religion in this argument. God said a man should only have sex with his own wife, and vice-versa. I feel for Bill having to do that, but he should have known that when he married her!<vbg>