>10 Million records with graphics is nothing for SQL Server. It can handle terrabytes of data.
>
>
>>Dear Craig,
>>
>>But is cost the only difference? A client of us claims that the tools of MySQL are not as robust as the ones of Oracle and the database cannot be as big (and in this case we need a large database with 10 Miljon records and some 200K per record including fields with graphical files in them).

So can MySQL, which is what he was asking about. And, I note the Wikipedia uses MySql and seems to be pretty responsive.

Regards,