First common sense would tell me that with poll ratings approaching the equivalent of zero, publicizing anything that would help would be foremost on their mind. And documents to link Iraq to terrorists would be at the front of the list.

And that ain't happening. Why?

But on the other side:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200603020004
http://mediamatters.org/items/200510140003
http://mediamatters.org/items/200507130002
http://mediamatters.org/items/200410070007

>>I just did some googling to find information about these documents. The only article that really discussed them in depth was from investors business daily. It discussed how the pentagon is supposidly sitting on all these documents.
>>
>
>You need a broader shovel:
>
>http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/03/18/us_puts_iraqi_documents_on_the_web/
>http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/2006/03/saddam-era-documents.html
>http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004782.htm
>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/006710.php
>
>>If there is such proof of a link so readily available, why has the administration gone to such elaborate lengths to fabricate evidence, to put credence in proven liars?
>
>Umm...yeah.
>
>Meanwhile, dig this:
>
>http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/193hqlnl.asp