>I don't wanna right you off like 'crackpot',
>but when I said filty rich Saudi Citisen who I was talking about ?
>Saudi King ???
>I also said 'network', what network did you hv in mind ?
>
>I am sure he (not Saudi King) was happy about it, (9/11) aldough he denied it himself at first if you remember, (and real muslim of his size DOES NOT LIE) but If he was in Afganistan at that time, then he was not for sure at command post of this operation.

From the horse's mouth
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/response/investigation/011213.binladen.tape.html

>
>He might hv *inspired it* via those video tapes and then 'network' did it, but it is fairly dificult to discover all roots, branches and leaves involved in that. I hope someone come up with all root nodes of that complex treeview.

This is being done. Here's the wiki list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_alleged_al-Qaeda_members

>
>Nonetheless, Afganistan got invaded as result of BinLaden spending some time there. It was as justified as bombing chain of Hilton hotels where I am sure he stayed at some point, before going caves.

The Taliban had ample time to give him up. They chose not to.

>Did Afganistan with their armed forces physically attack US?
>Yes or no?
No

>If YES then it wld hv been justified.

They were harboring the terrorist responsible for the deaths of 3000 Americans. The attack on the World Trade Center was an act of war.

>Since they did NOT, then you hv about the same justification (according to that logic) to invade minimum another 10-15 countries.

From the wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Afghanistan

"On September 14, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed H.J. Res. 64 (420-1) [2] and S.J. Res. 23 (98-0) [3], which authorized "the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or person he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001"

"The UN Security Council also issued a resolution on September 18, 2001 directed towards the Taliban demanding that they hand over the terrorist Osama bin Laden and close all terrorist training camps immediately and unconditionally. The council also referred to a resolution it adopted in December 2000 demanding that the Taliban turn over bin Laden to the United States or a third country for trial in the deadly bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa in August 1998."

The war was justified not just in America but by the UN.

>It is just matter of choice.
>
>
>>>Or maybe no oil - no interest.
>>
>>Oil is definately THE reason for the US's interest in the middle east. Anyone denying this is a liar or a fool.
>
>Thank you.

You're welcome