>>>We are having too much with Visual FoxPro as the backend.
>>
>>Not sure what you mean:
>>
>>- Is your code tied too closely to a VFP backend? Doesn't WC help with this?
>>
>>- Or do you need to keep a VFP backend for marketing purposes (e.g. "powered by VFP") :)?
>
>Outch, I forgot the word "fun". So, it should have said:
>
>"We are having too much fun with Visual FoxPro as the backend."
Ah, OK.
For a while I've thought an interesting project for SednaX would be to extend VFP to easily/automatically/transparently handle arbitrarily large tables. But, with free RDBMSs already being available for download (e.g. PostgreSQL, MySQL) it would probably be a waste of time.
Regards. Al
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
