>>>>>
>>>>>I also believe that freedom is a cause worth pursuing for the world. Through diplomacy, revolution and war if necessary. This world will be much better off once all its people are free.
>>>>>
>>>>Without getting into the merits of one ideology/religion compared to the other........
>>>>
>>>>You do realize that if you substitute "Islam" for "freedom" you have the exact attitude held by Islamic terrorists?
>>>
>>>You do realize that "radical islam" and "freedom" are polar opposites?
>>
>>duh................I never thought of that.
>>
>>So it's okay for you to do/support all the things they do because you are on the correct side of the arguement. Funny, that's exactly what they say.
>
>OK let's play the substitution game...
>I suppose my statement means nothing because you can substitute any of the following and get the same attitude held by others.
>
>natzism
>slavery
>white power
>nambla
>
>In answer to your question. Yes. I am on the correct side of the arguement. What is so objectionable about the pursuit of freedom for all?

There's nothing objectionable about the pursuit of freedom for all. It's the methodology I object to. You can't condem somebody for using a specific method to obtain their goal and then support using the same tactics to support your goals.

If you feel it's evil for the Islamist to start/support a revolution in (pick a non-Islamic country) for the purpose of installing an Islamic regime then it's evil for the US the right to start/support a revolution in (pick an Islamic country) for the purpose of installing a democracy.