>>>In answer to your question. Yes. I am on the correct side of the arguement.
>>
>>Because you say so... I'm not convinced.

>You're not convinced that freedom is better than:
>nazism
>slavery
>white power
>nambla

Your logic is quite interesting, and would require more time to contemplate. For the time being, may it suffice to say that I'm not convinced that you're on the correct side of the argument.

>I don't know what to do with that.
>
>>>What is so objectionable about the pursuit of freedom for all?
>>
>>Define freedom.
>
>http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/freedom
>
>;)
>
>Seriously though do you see an equivilence between pursuit of freedom and pursuit of tyranny? Is there no cause worthy of war?

I see that the Merriam-Webster definition doesn't mention specific social system as a prerequisite for freedom. It does, however, list "the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action". So, forcing your model of freedom upon other nations would actually be coercion, which then makes them not free by this very definition.

Same goes for democracy - you can't possibly think that the American model thereof is the only valid one.