General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Title:
2 questions regarding splitting transactions in accounting
Hi Everyone:
I have 2 possibly simple (and related) questions which I haven’t done anything to solve since I’ve started using foxpro.
1. I’ve created an accounting program (more like a data entry program considering my limited foxpro skills). I’ve come up with a problem when I want to split a transaction between two different companies or people. For example, I’d have an invoice in which a portion of it is attributable to one of our clients, and the remainder is attributable to a different client. Currently, all I do is have separate fields that holds the client id, therefore I know which clients are involved in the transaction. However, that does nothing to provide me with the percentages/amounts per client. When I come to year end and want to find out the invoices attributable to each client, it becomes tricky and I have to manually go back and do the math.
I’m thinking that the way to do this would be to have a separate logical field to say that the entry is “split”, and then have an amount field for each client id that gets entered. Is there a better way to do this? This also leads to my second question:
2. In the above case, I would have to have fields for each potential client and their portion of the transaction. Therefore, if I anticipate that a transaction could be split between 5 different clients, then I would need 5 fields to hold the client id, and 5 fields to hold the amount for each client. That in this case is not difficult to do, but in other programs I can see where a similar situation might have transactions split between many more than 5 clients. Is there a different way to do this then having a separate field for each potential split in the transaction? Or is this the way that this is done?
Thanks for any advice/suggestions!
Paul
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only